Antique-shop.com

Antiques! => Antique Questions Forum => Topic started by: tennessee girl on February 08, 2007, 05:54:50 PM

Title: china in attic
Post by: tennessee girl on February 08, 2007, 05:54:50 PM
Hi there, :)
I have a question that I'm hoping someone can answer for me. Ok, I have a set of dishes marked United china company Sebring Ohio Warranted 22k gold United special #3 011. How old are they? What is there worth? All in very good condition, only one plate has a chip on the side. Pretty gold design around a bouquet of flowers. I have googled to find more info but didn't see this pattern. Any info will be useful.
Thanks
Title: Re: china in attic
Post by: D&b antiques on February 08, 2007, 06:20:27 PM
let's see if tim can locate, kerrybee our pottery expert. that company only worked one (1) year. circa 1921
Title: Re: china in attic
Post by: Tim on February 08, 2007, 09:59:13 PM
skeezakaaaaaa,abraaaaaaakkkkkeeeeeekiiiiiii..........come in KB where ever you are...........over. ...
Title: Re: china in attic
Post by: D&b antiques on February 09, 2007, 04:35:05 PM
sorry tim thought you had her e-mail. I have'will contact.
Title: Re: china in attic
Post by: dontbe on February 09, 2007, 06:15:59 PM
I sent her an invite.. Db, is her email at "teleport.com" still?
Title: Re: china in attic
Post by: Tim on February 09, 2007, 08:03:43 PM
Hi all...........I did email KB. I just threw in the short wave radio post for effect............. .Tim 8)
Title: Re: china in attic
Post by: dontbe on February 11, 2007, 08:54:08 PM
Hi all...........I did email KB. I just threw in the short wave radio post for effect............. .Tim 8)
Tim, your not a HAM by any chance...? :)

Has anyone heard from her?

Hey, I finally added a couple of advertisements... about time, after 10 years on the web, ehe? perhaps Ill actually make a couple dollars  ;) :D

Title: Re: china in attic
Post by: Tim on February 12, 2007, 07:38:31 AM
Sorry Ed, not a HAM in the radio sense your talking about. I probably am a ham in other ways though. I haven't heard a word on or from KB. I hope she's alright.......

Tim 8)
Title: Re: china in attic
Post by: D&b antiques on February 12, 2007, 04:12:16 PM
Hey' guy's kerry is sick.this stupid computer crashed. cost me $400.00 dollars to fix. please excuse large letters eye's getting bad. she will return as soon as possible. let's wish her to get well soon!
Title: Re: china in attic
Post by: dontbe on February 12, 2007, 04:29:13 PM
Hey' guy's kerry is sick.this stupid computer crashed. cost me $400.00 dollars to fix. please excuse large letters eye's getting bad. she will return as soon as possible. let's wish her to get well soon!

What is her email, Id like to send her a get well email. (I dont think I have the most current one)
DB, you can make the font bigger if you hold down the control button, and roll the wheel on your mouse... :)
Ed
Title: Re: china in attic
Post by: tennessee girl on February 12, 2007, 10:09:16 PM
Hello, I would just like to add a picture for all to see. Anyone know the "secret code". AAAAAAARRRGGGGGGGGG .  :) ;) :D ;D >:( :( 8) ??? ::) :P :-[ :-X :-\ :-* :'( i have tried attaching
Title: Re: china in attic
Post by: Tim on February 12, 2007, 10:23:55 PM
Hi Tennessee girl.............on Jan 26 I posted a thread titled (Test photo). It should give instructions on setting up an account with 'photobucket' a web imaging host or there are others you can use. Hope that helps you. It's pretty easy after you've done it once or twice.
_____________
best.........Tim 8)
Title: Re: china in attic
Post by: dontbe on February 13, 2007, 08:40:02 AM
Hello, I would just like to add a picture for all to see. Anyone know the "secret code". AAAAAAARRRGGGGGGGGG .  :) ;) :D ;D >:( :( 8) ??? ::) :P :-[ :-X :-\ :-* :'( i have tried attaching

you can only attach photos that are smaller than 1meg. that is the only thing that should stop if from uploading. I just upped the limit to 1.5 meg, so try it again if you will.
if the picture is smaller than that, please let me know, and I will work with you to solve the issue.
I would rather you load the photos here than photobucket or any other third party place, simply because I never know when those remote pictures are going to go away, and its no fun looking up an old post when the photos are gone...
Title: Re: china in attic
Post by: tennessee girl on February 13, 2007, 03:43:46 PM
Alright, here we go.....Wooooooooooo ooooHooooooooooooHi p Hip Hooooooooooray !!!!!!! Idid it
I had the brilliant idea to save it "best for web". sometimes the answer stares you right in the face.
Title: Re: china in attic
Post by: D&b antiques on February 13, 2007, 05:51:38 PM
if i were selling $25.00 dollars a plate. no chip's or cracks.
Title: Re: china in attic
Post by: dontbe on February 13, 2007, 06:13:08 PM
Hey, I really like that design.
Title: Re: china in attic
Post by: D&b antiques on February 13, 2007, 06:53:41 PM
dontbe may be we could post a get well to kerry from here? she would like to keep her e-mail private. hey' tim your are correct on her e-mail.
Title: Re: china in attic
Post by: tennessee girl on February 13, 2007, 06:57:03 PM
Thank you,  :) I have the cups and saucers, dessert plates, bowls etc. Would they be about the same?
Title: Re: china in attic
Post by: tennessee girl on February 13, 2007, 07:01:06 PM
Kerry, I hope you get to feeling better.
Title: Re: china in attic
Post by: D&b antiques on February 13, 2007, 07:07:43 PM
cup's & saucers. $20.00 a set. bowl's cereal $10.00 apiece
Title: Re: china in attic
Post by: tennessee girl on February 13, 2007, 07:16:40 PM
ok, dumb question coming your way: a set being all cups and saucers or one cup and one saucer?
Thank you for being so patient and understanding.
Title: Re: china in attic
Post by: Tim on February 14, 2007, 08:21:12 AM
 Hi Tennessee........DB can correct me but I'm sure he means one set=1 cup, 1 saucer.
_________________
best..........Tim 8)
Title: Re: china in attic
Post by: tennessee girl on February 14, 2007, 04:12:15 PM
Thank you,
Now all I have to do is scout for a buyer.
Title: Re: china in attic
Post by: D&b antiques on February 14, 2007, 05:04:12 PM
thank's tim.should have been more clear' on the subject.